UPDATED: 03-20-26 14:37 PDT

stick LIU
  
LIU                   
W-L: ( 6- 1) PR = 90.2007

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 207 H Mt St Marys ( 0- 6, 85.4) 14-12 214 H Monmouth ( 3- 4, 89.9) 9- 8 221 A Iona ( 1- 8, 83.6) 16-10 224 A Rutgers ( 7- 2, 93.4) 5-13 301 A Bellarmine ( 4- 5, 89.8) 15- 7 307 H Queens ( 3- 3, 86.1) 13- 9 314 H Wagner ( 2- 5, 85.2) 20- 6 321 A Le Moyne ( 2- 7, 85.0) 328 A Detroit ( 1- 6, 86.1) 404 H Mercyhurst ( 2- 7, 82.3) 411 H VMI ( 3- 4, 86.5) 418 A Rob Morris ( 6- 2, 90.2) 425 H Cleveland St ( 3- 4, 88.0)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   207 H Mt St Marys            14-12       2     7    --    -4.93
   214 H Monmouth                9- 8       1     2          -1.49
   221 A Iona                   16-10       6     4           1.59
   224 A Rutgers                 5-13      -8    -5          -1.67
   301 A Bellarmine             15- 7       8    -2    +++    8.74
   307 H Queens                 13- 9       4     6    -     -2.24
   314 H Wagner                 20- 6      14     7           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   207 H Mt St Marys            14-12       2     7    --    -4.93
   307 H Queens                 13- 9       4     6    -     -2.24

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   301 A Bellarmine             15- 7       8    -2    +++    8.74

LIU Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Air Force LIU   LIU
Albany Albany   Albany
Army Army insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Army
Bellarmine LIU LIU  
Binghamton LIU   LIU
Boston Univ Boston Univ   Boston Univ
Brown Brown   Brown
Bryant LIU   LIU
Bucknell Bucknell tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bucknell
Canisius LIU tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) LIU
Cleveland St LIU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) LIU
Colgate Colgate   Colgate
Cornell Cornell   Cornell
Dartmouth Dartmouth   Dartmouth
Delaware LIU   LIU
Denver Denver   Denver
Detroit LIU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) LIU
Drexel Drexel tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Drexel
Duke Duke   Duke
Fairfield Fairfield   Fairfield
Georgetown Georgetown   Georgetown
Hampton LIU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) LIU
Harvard Harvard   Harvard
High Point High Point   High Point
Hobart LIU   LIU
Hofstra LIU tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) LIU
Holy Cross LIU   LIU
Iona LIU LIU  
Jacksonville Jacksonville tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Jacksonville
JHU JHU   JHU
Lafayette Lafayette tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Lafayette
Le Moyne LIU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) LIU
Lehigh Lehigh tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Lehigh
Loyola Loyola   Loyola
Manhattan LIU LIU   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Marist LIU tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) LIU
Marquette Marquette   Marquette
Maryland Maryland   Maryland
UMass UMass   UMass
UMassLowell LIU insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) LIU
Mercer LIU   LIU
Mercyhurst LIU LIU   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Merrimack LIU   LIU
Michigan Michigan   Michigan
Monmouth LIU LIU  
Mt St Marys LIU LIU  
Navy Navy tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Navy
NJIT LIU insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) LIU
No Carolina No Carolina tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) No Carolina
Notre Dame Notre Dame tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Notre Dame
Ohio State Ohio State tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Ohio State
Pennsylvania Pennsylvania   Pennsylvania
Penn St Penn St   Penn St
Princeton Princeton insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Princeton
Providence Providence   Providence
Queens LIU LIU  
Quinnipiac LIU   LIU
Richmond Richmond   Richmond
Rob Morris LIU tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) LIU
Rutgers Rutgers Rutgers  
Sacred Heart Sacred Heart tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Sacred Heart
Siena Siena   Siena
St Bonnies LIU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) LIU
St Johns LIU tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) LIU
St Josephs St Josephs   St Josephs
Stony Brook LIU tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) LIU
Syracuse Syracuse   Syracuse
Towson Towson   Towson
UMBC LIU tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) LIU
Utah Utah tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Utah
Vermont Vermont tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Vermont
Villanova Villanova tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Villanova
Virginia Virginia   Virginia
VMI LIU tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) LIU
Wagner LIU LIU  
Yale Yale   Yale

PowerWise = 32


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 7.14

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Mt St Marys     ( 0- 6, 85.4)    14-12      -14.45       6.26      -2.18         1.02             8.33
   0 H Monmouth        ( 3- 4, 89.9)     9- 8      -10.02      10.69      -2.18         1.02            17.38
   0 A Iona            ( 1- 8, 83.6)    16-10      -16.29       4.42       2.18         1.02            13.47
   0 A Rutgers         ( 7- 2, 93.4)     5-13       -6.54      14.17       2.18         1.02            -2.23
   0 A Bellarmine      ( 4- 5, 89.8)    15- 7      -10.13      10.57       2.18         1.02            26.02
   0 H Queens          ( 3- 3, 86.1)    13- 9      -13.76       6.94      -2.18         1.02             9.73
   0 H Wagner          ( 2- 5, 85.2)    20- 6      -14.65       6.06      -2.18         1.02             7.92
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        80.62

winning pts = 82.8446 losing points = -2.2276

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------